You are watching: Why did frodo leave the shire
Q: Why did Frodo Wait 17 years to leave the Shire?
ANSWER: This is among those inquiries that occurs from the conflict in between the Peter Jackson movies and also J.R.R. Tolkien’s book. It has been asked both ways: “What occurred to the seventeen year gap between the bye Party and Frodo’s exit from the Shire (in the movie)?”
In other words, why go Peter Jackson not tell the very same story together J.R.R. Tolkien? ns don’t know. We might as well ask why Rhett and Scarlett only had actually one boy in the film version of “Gone through the Wind”. But we should shot to resolve a misperception as best we can.
Frodo did not wait seventeen year to leave the Shire. No in the book, at any rate.
There is no doubt the Peter Jackson’s variation of events leaves the end a seventeen year gap in between Bilbo’s departure and Gandalf’s conversation v Frodo. But in the publication Frodo waited several months prior to leaving the Shire after Gandalf explained the history of the Ring come him.
Frodo own the One Ring as part of his inheritance native Bilbo because that seventeen year (in the book) without understanding what it was or the anyone was looking for it. Gandalf only suspects there is something far-ranging about the Ring throughout those years. We have actually only scanty information around Gandalf’s timeline throughout the 17 years:T.A. 3001 (Bilbo’s party). Gandalf calls top top Aragorn to help him look because that Gollum3004-8 Gandalf visits Frodo periodically in the Shire (obviously not looking for Gollum)3009-17 Gandalf and also Aragorn find high and also low for Gollum. Gandalf climate visits Minas Tirith and also finds Isildur’s scroll. Aragorn captures Gollum.
What Peter Jackson leaves out is Gandalf’s search for Gollum. Yet he also dismisses Frodo’s unnerving preservation through those years: he appears to have not aged at all, as with Bilbo. That was a clear sign of the Ring’s power but in the publication it is not immediately apparent to the leader what is walking on. You need to know what the Ring is to understand what the foreshadowing means.
So apologists because that the films could argue the there was just no suggest in reflecting the 17 year void as the did not advancement the story, and the cinematic adaptation had to cut out a the majority of things to maximize display time because that those aspects of the story the Peter and his team felt were most important. Yet only Peter Jackson can safeguard this point, and some people might feeling he walk not protect it fine (if at all). The power of the Ring is very hard to define without a lot of exposition and exposition rarely does fine in film (e.g., the “Unexpected Party” in “The Hobbit: An unanticipated Journey”, which i alone it seems ~ to have loved for its faithfulness come Tolkien).
On the various other hand, the narrative of Gandalf’s find for Gollum needs to wait in the book until everyone has actually gathered in ~ Rivendell. The movies don’t share every the cool and also interesting details that Elrond’s council, using that time instead to create tension in between the characters (including between Boromir and also everyone else). So there is no an possibility to explain Gandalf’s long lack further into the story, I have the right to see why it might seem better to leave out the 17-year gap. Otherwise, Gandalf just inexplicably vanishes because that 17 years and also Frodo needs to forget all about the Ring (or not).
The publication can take liberties that the movies lack time for. But the disparity between film and also book does show up to have created some confusion on the allude of why Frodo stayed in the Shire every those years. He continued to be there due to the fact that he was no yet in danger. He just learned the he was in hazard after Gandalf found Isildur’s role (and the was had in the movie) and returned to the Shire to explain the totality convoluted mess to Frodo.
From that point forward both the book and also the movie develop a feeling of urgency. Of course, the film reflects the Nazgul issuing soon from Mordor whereas the publication leaves lock in the background lesson until the first Black Rider shows up. In this case Peter Jackson’s foreshadowing is much less oblique than Tolkien’s, and also not really setup up a an enig for the audience so much as a confrontation.
As because that Frodo’s delay in the book, the was intentional because neither he nor Gandalf feeling he have to leave ideal away. That would certainly stir up attention in his intentions and activities. And also so Frodo suggest in April 3018 the he leave Bag finish on his fiftieth birthday in September. Gandalf agreed since that would provide Frodo time to make arrangements, arrangements which proved to be far-ranging in the book but not in the movie.
Hence, in the movies Frodo does not offer Bag end to the Sackville-Bagginses; nor does the return to assist cleanse the Shire that Sharkey and also his men. All of that was cut from the films, made possible by Saruman’s early fatality at Isengard. Many civilization were certainly upset at the loss of “The Scouring of the Shire” in the movies, however what’s done is done. Frodo was hence able to leaving the Shire really quickly after discovering the Ring’s true nature in the movie.
See more: Print Chapter 10 : The Major Head Flexor Muscles Are The __________.
And so i think the proper answer to every these questions is simply that the movie tell a various story from that told in the book. Whether it to be a justifiable departure will be discussed for years, possibly centuries. But at the an extremely least those who care about the publications should it is in glad to recognize that Frodo walk not just hang approximately waiting because that the poor guys to practically catch him. He live quietly and also peacefully till it was time come go, and also then things started to become dramatic, in both the movies and the book.
# # #
Have you read our other Tolkien and sdrta.net Questions and also Answers articles?