I it seems to be ~ to be seeing another player, or myself, having 4 the a kind as soon as every 100 - 150 hands.

You are watching: Odds of 4 of a kind

This has happened in the an ar of 20+ times over the food of 2 weeks. I supplied to watch 4 of a kind when every 1000 - 2000 hands.

I"m recognize it fairly odd, I"ve had it around 6 time myself in the past 2 weeks. In the period of seeing all of these 4 that a kinds, I"ve played around 2000 - 2500 hand at most.

How frequently statistically, should any kind of player in ~ a 9 seat table be obtaining 4 that a kind? even if lock fold and I don"t view it, what"s the basic odds of 1 in 9 football player making 4 of a kind?

As a bonus question, if ns may, what are the odds of losing with 4 the a type to a better 4 of a kind?

texas-hold-em odds hand
enhance this concern
edited may 24 "16 in ~ 5:56
asked might 23 "16 at 20:19

1,20611 yellow badge1212 silver badges1919 bronze title
add a comment |

4 answer 4

active earliest Votes
1) according to http://wizardofodds.com/games/sdrta.net/, the probability that you deserve to see quads at a 9-player table (assuming no one ever folds) is:0.013183% or ~ once every 7586 hands

2) For her bonus question, i am not fairly sure if that"s what you are looking for, however have a look in here: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/25/probability/quads-over-quads-odds-866086/(assuming the 2 players start with 2 pocket pairs,and they"re walking to check out all 5 ar cards) that is calculated: ~ 1 in 38,916 hands

++ quick tip by the way: ns would"t worry too lot if I ever won/lost a huge pot with/to quads. Due to the fact that it happens that rarely, the doesn"t make lot of a difference in her gameplay, winrate etc. I would focus much more on "everyday" stuff, like cbet frequency, opening range, calling down frequencies etc and minimize my leaks in those sections.

enhance this prize
edited may 24 "16 in ~ 9:20
answered might 24 "16 at 8:59

78833 silver badges77 bronze title
add a comment |
How regularly statistically, should any player in ~ a 9 seat table be gaining 4 of a kind? also if castle fold and also I don"t check out it, what"s the general odds that 1 in 9 football player making 4 the a kind?

The cardinality (whole possible hole + commie cards) is 52 taking 7: 133784560The wanted scenarios for you involve freezing 4 cards being same (13 scenarios) and also 3 the end of the continuing to be 48 cards: 13 * 17296 = 224848.

The odds are like 0.0017 through dividing desired / cardinality, however this will include instances of 4oak being ar cards.

If you desire to to exclude, the in-table 4-of-a-kind (you desire it just for you), then you will need to calculate prefer this:

cardinality: 674274182400 (52 acquisition 7 in details order).scenarios: 13 * 17296 * 5040 (13 sdrta.nets, 48 acquisition 3 totally free cards, 5040 means 7! i m sorry contemplates arbitrarily sort) - 48 * 47 * 13 * 46 * 120 (scenarios where you don"t have one the those cards in her hand, yet anyway the is 4oak, while the last 120 is 5! i m sorry contemplates arbitrary kind in the commie cards; arbitrary type is already contemplated in the hole cards as soon as multiplying 48 * 47).

The an outcome is 0.0014 here.

In this 0.0014, however, one more player (only one!) could also have 4oak, if the happens, scenarios are favor this:

XX vs YY through XXYY? : 13 * 6 * 12 * 6 * 44 * 120 (which stand for: 44 as the ?, 120 as 5! because that arbitrary flop order, 6 in both cases for suit mix in hands) = 29652480.?X vs YY with XXXYY : 13 * 4 * 44 * 12 * 6 * 120 (which stands for: 44 together the ?, 120 as 5! because that arbitrary flop order, 4 and 6 because that suit mix in hands) = 19768320.XX vs ?Y v XXYYY : 19768320 very same situation yet reciprocal.

The inquiry marks change bricks. Therefore you desire to discard those scenarios when another one has actually a different 4oak:

cardinality: 674274182400 (52 acquisition 7 in particular order; this one did not change).scenarios: 13 * 17296 * 5040 - 29652480 - 19768320 - 19768320 = 902154240.

Your odds of acquiring exclusive 4oak and also nobody rather getting one more 4oak is: 0.0013. In the various other 0.0001 case the various other one will get one more 4oak, therefore by having actually an exclusive 4oak there"s a 1/14 possibility the other one has one more exclusive 4oak as well.

Please I need a cross-review in this point! I"d like to inspect if 0.0013 is a an excellent result or ns screwed v the calc application. I recognize it looks quite weird come me this 1/14 difference

As a bonus question, if ns may, what room the odds of shedding with 4 that a sort to a much better 4 the a kind?

Now concentrating on the conditional analysis on the game table. If your hand/commie currently look prefer this:

XX through XXYYY: One arbitrary opponent has a possibility of having actually 4oak in 44 / 45 * 22 = 0.04444?X v XXXYY: One arbitrary adversary has a possibility of having 4oak in 1 / 45 * 22 = 0.00101XX through XXYY?: One arbitrary adversary has a opportunity of having actually 4oak in 1 / 45 * 22 = 0.00101

By having actually those script configurations, you need to map the value of X like this:

2 is precious 0, 10 is worth 8.J Q K A is worth 9 10 11 12.Lets speak to MAP(X) this mapping the converts the values choose I told.12 will be the maximum worth here.

Given those three scenarios which can risk of having one more 4oak from only one arbitrarily opponent, girlfriend require secondary condition: and also the other player beats me through an Y-valued sdrta.net, therefore the worths are:

0.04444 * (12 - MAP(X)) / 12 for scenario XX XXYYY.0.00101 * (12 - MAP(X)) / 12 because that scenario XX XXYY?.0.00101 * (12 - MAP(X)) / 12 because that scenario ?X XXXYY.

See more: The Standard For Comparison In An Experiment, Scientific Method Review

Disclaimer: These outcomes are probabilistic fractions, i m sorry are constantly in close up door interval <0..1>. Since none of these worths is zero, you have the right to calculate H = 1 / value and later on say "the possibilities are 1 in H hands".